Indications and Technical Considerations of Different Fibula Grafts Considerations in the Fixation of Bone Grafts for the Reconstruction of Mandibular Continuity Defects Current Practice and Future Trends in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Microvascular Bone Surgery Autogenous Bone Grafts in Maxillofacial Reconstruction Considerations for Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Oncologic Patient Aesthetic Considerations in Reconstructive and Corrective Craniomaxillofacial Bone Surgery Prosthodontic Considerations in Dental Implant Restoration Computerized Tomography and Its Use for Craniomaxillofacial Dental Implantology Maxillary Sinus Grafting and Osseointegration Surgery

The ITI Dental Implant System in Maxillofacial Applications Localized Ridge Augmentation Using Guided Bone Regeneration in Deficient Implant Sites Advanced Bone Healing Concepts in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Bone Surgery Bioresorbable Materials for Bone Fixation: Review of Biological Concepts and Mechanical Aspects Metal for Craniomaxillofacial Internal Fixation Implants and Its Physiological Implications Craniomaxillofacial Bone Healing, Biomechanics, and Rigid Internal Fixation Craniomaxillofacial Bone Infections: Etiologies, Distributions, and Associated Defects Oral Malignancies: Etiology, Distribution, and Basic Treatment Considerations Review of Benign Tumors of the Maxillofacial Region and Considerations for Bone Invasion Etiology, Distribution, and Classification of Craniomaxillofacial Deformities: Review of Nasal Deformities

Etiology, Distribution, and Classification of Craniomaxillofacial Deformities: Traumatic Defects Craniofacial Deformities: Review of Etiologies, Distribution, and Their Classification Evaluation of the Craniomaxillofacial Deformity Patient While the sample size of some of the analyses is somewhat small, this study demonstrated that the NDI achieved a high degree of reliability and internal consistency. Secondly, in a larger subset of 30 subjects, NDI scores were compared to scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, with similar moderately high correlations (0.69-0.70). First, on a smaller subset of 10 patients who completed a course of conservative care, the percentage of change on NDI scores before and after treatment was compared to visual analogue scale scores of percent of perceived improvement in activity levels. Concurrent validity was assessed in two ways. The alpha coefficients were calculated from a pool of questionnaires completed by 52 such subjects resulting in a total index alpha of 0.80, with all items having individual alpha scores above 0.75. Test-retest reliability was conducted on an initial sample of 17 consecutive 'whiplash'-injured patients in an outpatient clinic, resulting in good statistical significance (Pearson's r = 0.89, p less than or equal to. Face validity was ensured through peer-review and patient feedback sessions. A modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index was conducted producing a 10-item scaled questionnaire entitled the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Methods of assessment for such disability, especially those targeted at activities of daily living which are most affected by neck pain, are few in number. Injuries to the cervical spine, especially those involving the soft tissues, represent a significant source of chronic disability.

Neck disability index spanish pdf